alupas.eu

How do I demonstrate the CO2 emissions per tonne of aluminium?

CO2 per ton follows from two separate processes, not from one method

The CO2 emissions per ton of aluminium are currently being made visible through two different schemes, and those two are not aligned. The first process is the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM, Regulation (EU) 2023/956): this requires importers of aluminium from outside the EU to report embedded emissions per ton, and that is already happening. The second process is the digital product passport under the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781): this concerns the environmental information that will soon have to be included in the passport of aluminium products, including CO2 data, but the precise calculation and measurement method for this still needs to be established per product group. Anyone wishing to demonstrate CO2 per ton now does so on the basis of the CBAM system for imports, or on the basis of their own calculation that aligns with recognised methods — a mandatory, uniform method for the digital product passport of aluminium does not yet exist.

Who this applies to and what it does not cover

The CBAM obligation primarily affects importers: anyone importing aluminium from outside the EU will face a reporting obligation regarding the embedded emissions of that product. This is a different starting point than the digital product passport, which is aimed at manufacturers and importers placing products on the EU market and who will soon — once the rules for aluminium come into force — have to provide a passport with environmental information. This section does not cover the exact calculation formula for CBAM emissions, nor does it cover how a specific user should measure their own production process: that follows from CBAM's own implementing rules, and for the product passport from the delegated act yet to be published. What is addressed here is the question of which framework currently exists and which framework still needs to be established.

From when this is required, and what applies until then

CBAM is already in force as a regulation and the reporting obligation for embedded emissions is already running; the precise phase in which an importer finds itself (reporting or also actually offsetting) follows from Regulation (EU) 2023/956 itself. For the digital product passport of aluminium, it is different: Article 39 of the ESPR determines that test, measurement and calculation methods are established per product group, but for aluminium that delegated act has not yet been published. A date from which this becomes mandatory for aluminium is therefore not yet fixed. Until that act is in place, there is no legally prescribed method for CO2 per ton in the context of the product passport — although the existing CBAM obligation does apply to those importing.

What this means for practice, step by step

Anyone dealing with this question now should first check whether there is aluminium being imported from outside the EU involved: in that case, the route is via CBAM, and the embedded CO2 emissions per ton are already part of an ongoing reporting obligation. Anyone producing or processing aluminium within the EU and preparing for the digital product passport would be well advised to already start collecting data on energy consumption, origin of raw materials and production process per ton — not because this is already being legally required for the passport, but because this data forms the basis once the method for aluminium has been published. A third step is to monitor official publications: both the implementing rules under CBAM and the delegated act under the ESPR appear in the Official Journal of the EU, and only then will it become clear which calculation method will exactly apply for the product passport. Until such time, aligning with an already recognised methodology — such as that of CBAM, to the extent applicable — is the most obvious intermediate step, without this providing any guarantee that the same method will also be prescribed for the passport.

The source: CBAM regulation and Article 39 of the ESPR

The reporting obligation on embedded emissions upon import follows directly from Regulation (EU) 2023/956, which establishes the carbon border adjustment mechanism and designates aluminium as one of the affected product categories. The future method for CO2 data in the digital product passport follows from Article 39 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), which specifies that test, measurement and calculation methods per product group shall be established by delegated act — an act that has not yet been published for aluminium.

Anyone wishing to get started now should begin by checking whether their own situation falls under the CBAM reporting obligation (for imports from outside the EU), and in the meantime record production and energy data per tonne, so that this data is ready once the method for the digital product passport for aluminium is published.

What this is based on

The regulation itself is on EUR-Lex. We refer per statement; you do not have to take our word for it.

What you must concretely do

What is expected of you

CO₂ emissions per ton of aluminium is a figure that appears in multiple places, each with its own framework and its own burden of proof. Different rules, different forms, and at present also no definitive calculation method for the passport itself apply to the digital product passport and to CBAM. This makes the subject confusing, but the obligations can be broken down.

A calculation according to an established method

For the digital product passport, measurements and calculations may not be freely chosen: Article 39 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) stipulates that testing, measurement and calculation are carried out according to methods established for the product component. For aluminium, that method for CO₂ per ton has not yet been published. In practical terms, this means for a company with 10 to 100 employees that its own calculation method — however carefully drawn up — will have to be replaced once the official method is available. If a company is already working with greenhouse gas accounting, for example for a customer or for CBAM, it is well advised to keep those figures and the underlying source data separately, so that a later conversion to the official method does not mean that everything has to be collected again. More information on the status of that method can be found on the page about the method by which the values for the passport are measured.

Demonstrating the origin of the figure

A CO₂ figure per ton is only useful if it is clear where it comes from: from which factory, which process, which energy mix. For a company that purchases and processes aluminium, this means that the origin of the figure — not only the figure itself — must be recorded. In aluminium, emissions per ton vary widely between primary aluminium (electrolysis) and recycled aluminium (remelting), and the two must not be mixed into a single average without it being clear how that average is composed. This also touches on the question of how much recycled material is in a batch; those two figures — CO₂ per ton and the proportion of recycled aluminium — belong together and are often asked in one breath. See also how the proportion of recycled aluminium is demonstrated.

CBAM as a separate, already existing process

Separately from the product passport, CBAM already exists: Regulation (EU) 2023/956 requires a declarant on import of aluminium from outside the EU to report the embedded greenhouse gas emissions. For a company importing aluminium, this is therefore not a future obligation but a current one. The figures drawn up for CBAM — per ton, per product category, per installation of origin — are not automatically the same figures that will later appear in the product passport, because the systems have been set up separately, but the underlying source data (energy consumption, process data from the producer) are often reusable. What CBAM exactly requires and for whom is set out on the page on CBAM and aluminium.

Distinction between file and passport

For a company that is already having a CO₂ calculation made — for a customer, for a sustainability report, for CBAM — the distinction between what remains internal and what will later be public in the passport is relevant. The passport shows an established figure according to an established method; the underlying calculation model, the assumptions and the source data remain outside it. That distinction between the technical file and the digital product passport is precisely where many companies get stuck, and is explained on the page on the difference between technical file and passport.

Where things go wrong in practice

A supplier provides one CO₂ figure per ton for an entire annual production, while that production consists partly of primary and partly of recycled aluminium. The average figure is then not traceable to a specific batch, and when asked for substantiation, there is no breakdown available.

Another scenario: a company uses for the product passport the same CO₂ value it has also stated for CBAM, without checking whether the scope and calculation rules match. CBAM uses its own system for embedded emissions in imports; this is not directly interchangeable with a method that will be established later for the passport.

A third situation: an importer of aluminium semi-finished products takes over the CO₂ figure from the foreign producer without source documents, and cannot provide anything more than an email or a line on a quotation when asked for evidence.

A fourth situation: a company calculates a CO₂ value itself using its own calculation model, assuming this can be automatically transferred to the product passport later. Once the official method under Article 39 of the ESPR is published, the own approach turns out to deviate in some respects, and the figure must be rebuilt — something that could have been prevented by keeping the source data structured from the outset.

A fifth: a company thinks the CO₂ figure is a confidential business secret and does not want to share it with the party compiling the passport, while it is unclear which part of that information will later be public and which part can remain protected. That consideration belongs to the question whether business-sensitive data on aluminium must be made public, and is different from the question of who may access the data, which is answered on the page on who may see which data from the product passport.

What you can document now

  • Per batch or production lot: the CO₂ figure per tonne, with indication of the calculation method or tool used and its version.
  • The source of the figure: factory, process line, and whether it concerns primary or recycled aluminium, or a mixing ratio.
  • The source data on which the figure is based: energy consumption, energy mix, process data from the producer — kept separately from the final figure itself.
  • For imported aluminium: the CBAM reporting and the underlying data from the foreign producer or installation.
  • A note with each figure on whether it is intended for CBAM, for a customer request, or for future use in the product passport, so that scope and method do not become confused.
  • A reference to the alloy and EN-AW designation of the batch in question, because CO₂ figures can differ per alloy; see how the alloy and the EN-AW designation are recorded.

This is not legal advice. This page provides general information on the legislation that this platform covers. We do not know your situation. If in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.

Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-08-22. Is something not right? Let us know — corrections are prioritised.