Does the digital product passport apply to my aluminium?
No direct obligation yet, but already on the radar
The digital product passport does not currently apply to aluminium semi-finished products. There is no specific regulation published that concretely requires profiles, castings or packaging aluminium to have a passport. The ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) is a framework regulation: it sets out what a digital product passport is and how it works (Article 9), but the actual obligation only arises per product group, once the European Commission adopts a separate delegated act for it. For aluminium, this is still being planned, but has not yet been adopted. This does not mean the subject is not relevant — there is a good chance that aluminium will be addressed at some point — but it does mean that there is no legal obligation today.
For profiles, foundries and packaging aluminium: what will apply later, what does not yet
Article 1 of the ESPR describes the scope broadly: it concerns physical products placed on the market or put into service in the European Union. Aluminium semi-finished products — profiles for construction, castings for machinery or vehicles, packaging material — fall within that broad definition. Article 1 contains no exception that excludes aluminium as a material.
But "falling within the scope" is not the same as "already being obligatory". The regulation operates on a system whereby the concrete requirements — including the passport obligation — are laid down per product group in a delegated act (Article 9). As long as such an act does not exist for a product group, no obligation arises for that group, even if the product does fall within the scope of the regulation itself.
The distinction therefore lies not so much in the material aluminium itself, but in the question of whether a delegated act has already been adopted for the product group in which that aluminium is processed or traded. For some product groups — for example batteries — this step has already been taken. For aluminium semi-finished products it has not.
The date is not yet fixed
There is no fixed date when aluminium falls under the passport obligation. The European Commission's work plan for 2025-2030 mentions a delegated act for metals expected to be adopted in 2027. Only after publication of that act will it be clear from when aluminium semi-finished products must actually have a digital passport — and what exactly must be in that passport.
Alupas.eu takes into account in its planning a date around 2029, based on the usual time between the adoption of a delegated act and when companies must actually comply with it. This is an estimate, not a fixed date. Until the delegated act is actually in place, there is no passport obligation for aluminium, and as soon as that act is published, this page will be updated with the concrete date.
Three things you can do now
Anyone in the aluminium chain — as a producer, importer or processor — can already prepare themselves now without having to wait for the obligation.
First, it is worthwhile to map out which end products the aluminium in question ends up in. Building profiles, packaging and automotive parts can come up via different delegated acts and at different times, even though it is always the same material.
After that, it helps to continue monitoring the Commission's work plan and the publication of delegated acts, specifically for the metals or aluminium category. As soon as an act is published, it will also specify which data must be included in the passport.
Finally, it is worthwhile to start organizing the data that will likely appear in a future passport: composition, origin of the raw material, recycling percentage and manufacturing process. Anyone who already has that information structured will not have to start from scratch once the obligation is in place.
Where this is stated: Article 1 and Article 9 ESPR
Article 1 of the ESPR describes the subject matter and scope of the regulation: physical products placed on the EU market or put into service. Article 9 describes what a digital product passport contains and determines that the obligation to do so is introduced per product category via a delegated act. Together, these two articles establish that aluminium semi-finished products may fall within the scope of the regulation, but that the actual passport obligation only arises once a delegated act has been adopted and published for that specific product category.
Those wishing to monitor how this develops further can consult the European Commission's work plan and published delegated acts under the ESPR on EUR-Lex. Once an act for aluminium or metals appears, this page will be updated with the concrete date and precise requirements.
What this is based on
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 1 (subject matter and scope)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 9 (digital product passport)
The regulation itself is on EUR-Lex. We refer per statement; you do not have to take our word for it.
What you must concretely do
What is expected of you
The ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) is a framework regulation. This means that Article 1 sets out the scope broadly — in principle, almost all physical products can fall within it — but the regulation itself does not yet specify which product is subject to requirements when. That specification comes per product group in a delegated act. For aluminium semi-finished products, that act does not yet exist. What is currently expected of a company therefore falls into two parts: what the law prescribes in general terms, and what there is to do in practice as long as product-specific rules are still lacking.
Determining whether your product falls within the scope
Article 1 of the ESPR describes which product categories are eligible for ecodesign requirements, and with that also for a digital product passport. For a company of 10 to 100 employees, this means above all: checking whether its own product — profile, casting, packaging semi-finished product — fits within the description used by the regulation and the later delegated act. This is not a legal exercise in itself, but a matter of laying your own product catalogue alongside the text. A good starting point is the question which products from the aluminium sector fall under the ESPR, because there it is explained per product group how broad or narrow the delineation works out in practice.
Understanding that the passport becomes mandatory only via a delegated act
Article 9 of the ESPR describes what a digital product passport contains and what conditions it must meet, but the obligation to actually have one arises only at the moment the European Commission establishes a delegated act for the company's own product group. For companies, this means that there is now no legal obligation to already keep a passport, but a growing chance that that obligation will be introduced within the company's own sector. What a delegated act exactly is and why it determines what a manufacturer must do is elaborated on the page what is a delegated act and why does it determine what I must do.
Distinguishing between semi-finished product and end product
Many aluminium companies do not supply an end product to the consumer, but a profile, sheet or casting that is processed further down the chain. The question of whether the passport must already be part of the semi-finished product, or only of the end product in which it is processed, is relevant to the company's own position in the chain and to who supplies which data. This distinction is addressed on the page on whether a product passport is already required if the aluminium is still a semi-finished product.
Checking whether company size changes the obligation
Among smaller companies there is sometimes an assumption that a European obligation such as this applies only to large industrial players. Whether and to what extent company size plays a role varies by regulation and by exemptions that may be included in a delegated act. This is elaborated further on the page whether the product passport also applies to small companies.
Where things go wrong in practice
A number of patterns keep coming up with companies tackling this subject for the first time.
Assumption that "aluminium" is a single category. A profile manufacturer and a packaging film manufacturer look at the same raw material, but may fall under different delegated acts with different timelines. Anyone basing themselves on news about "aluminium and the product passport" without looking at their own product group is jumping to conclusions too quickly.
Confusing the framework regulation with the implementing rules. Articles 1 and 9 of the ESPR state what may eventually become applicable, not what is already in force. Companies that read the regulation as a direct obligation are jumping the gun or incurring unnecessary costs for a system that still needs to be aligned with the final requirements.
Do not make a distinction between primary and secondary aluminium. The origin of the material may have implications for which data are relevant in a passport, and possibly for the way a product is assessed. This is relevant to the question of whether the difference between primary and secondary aluminium is important for the company's own production line.
Uncertainty about spare parts and repair parts. A company that supplies loose parts for repair or maintenance sometimes assumes this falls outside any regulation because it is not a new end product. Whether that is correct depends on how the delegated act for the product group in question addresses this; see the explanation about loose aluminium spare parts.
Delaying the internal inventory too long. Some companies defer any preparation until the date is set, and then discover that their own data on composition, origin and processing have not been centrally documented. Having that inventory is useful regardless of the exact date the obligation comes into force.
What you can document now
Even without the delegated act in place, there are a number of matters that a company can already put in order and that will almost certainly prove relevant later:
- An inventory of the company's own product groups, linked to the descriptions in Article 1 of the ESPR, so that it is clear which part of the range may fall under future rules.
- Documentation on the origin of the material — primary, secondary, or a mix — per product line.
- A list of the data that are already available on composition, processing and origin, as a basis for what will eventually need to go into a passport. A starting point for this is on the page about which data will be included in the aluminium product passport.
- An internal note on the company's position in the supply chain: does the company supply a semi-finished product, a component, or an end product, and who is therefore likely to be responsible for the passport.
- Agreements with suppliers on sharing material data, so these do not have to be requested under time pressure as soon as an obligation becomes concrete.
This is not legal advice. This page provides general information on the legislation that this platform covers. We do not know your situation. If in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.
Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-08-22. Is something not right? Let us know — corrections are prioritised.